Instead of hiding behind Super Injunctions, why don’t these celebrities take responsibility for their actions?
For the whole of yesterday, a Twitter account user was naming celebrities who had taken super-injunctions, and their actions. Various news reports this morning were listing this user as a journalist crusading against the super-injunction phenomenon. There must be an element of truth to the user’s claims because the press are all over this story this morning. Perhaps if these named celebrities actually ‘fessed up to their antics, instead of going to great lengths to protect themselves, then they wouldn’t have anything to fear…
Graham – sorry, these people are in the public eye. They should have the werewithal to take responsibility for sexually harassing their staff, or having affairs, or groping horses. Had you or I done any of the above, then we would not be able to stop people finding out. Why should the rich and famous be allowed to throw money at courts regarding their seedy lifestyles to cover up what they have done?
Because they are undereducated, overpaid, con merchants who think they have the right to walk all over anyone they choose to! This part of the Law is wrong, and the Judges are’nt helping! Let them stand up and be counted, they make me sick!
|
|
20% Discount! Twitter Followers $0.01 |
|
|
TwiHeart.com – Premium WEB DOMAIN NAME on Sale! Two Twin Twitter Hearts Website $15.99 |
|
|
TWITTER MARKETING TIPS WEBSITE BUSINESS FOR SALE $24.95 |
|
|
Social Media Markteing Service Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, You Tube Huge +Bonus $54.99 |
|
|
ESTABLISHED TWITTER MARKETING WEBSITE FOR SALE $0.99 |
Tags: celebrities, celebrities named on twitter injunctions, censorship, privacy, superinjunctions, twitter, twitter celebrities injunctions, twitter list of celebrities injunctions